We expect technology to work. We expect it never to fail us. Frustration levels rise when the page we opened in Safari is taking too long to load. We can't understand why we are at a conference with bad WIFI that is preventing us from tweeting our opinions to the rest of the world. Ten years ago a Smartphone was not a necessity and today we panic if the battery is draining too quickly and our charger is nowhere to be found. A rash of expletives fall out of our mouths when we are trying to complete a transaction on line and have a bad user experience.
We don't just expect technology to work. We demand it. In fact many of us think it's smarter than we are.
Humans can and do make mistakes. But not technology.
Or so we think.
We forget that it is humans who create the technology. And it will always be humans who need to oversee their creations.
Case in point. The day after Christmas Delta Airlines experienced a glitch in their systems that offered crazy low fares - $6.99 round trip to Hawaii. The news of the offers spread like wildfire on the social networks while humans intervened to correct the mistake. The system did not know it made an error. The humans at the other end are the ones who found out and the ones who fixed it.
This kind of stuff happens. It will always happen. No matter how advanced artificial intelligence might get - it will break down. And what do you do when it happens to you?
In the case of Delta they did the right thing. Once they caught it they shut down the site until it was corrected. And because it was their error, they honored the bargain fares.
Which proves my point :
Like this blog? Don't want to miss the next one? Sign up here to have it delivered right to your mailbox!
Showing posts with label Technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Technology. Show all posts
Monday, January 6, 2014
Monday, July 29, 2013
7 Non-Techie Ways To Make An Impression - Day 28
I love all things digital. I admit to getting a bit geeked out over a cool new App or some new techie tool designed to make my life easier. But when it comes to standing out from the crowd and making a good impression the best and simplest way is by indulging in one or more of these good old-fashioned human tricks.
1- Say what you'll do and do what you say. A lot of people will tell you what they are going to do, but the fact remains that very few follow through.
2- Be on time. This is one of my pet peeves. Just ask my NYU students. For that matter ask anyone who knows me. I'm always on time. For two reasons. I consider your time valuable and do not want to keep you waiting. The second is I consider my time valuable too.
3- Listen. Actively and with interest. Most of us don't listen very well. We're off in that delusion that multi-tasking is cool. So why just sit and listen, when I can listen and check my emails or texts at the same time. The message you send is that the person in front of you is just not that important. Worse, they are likely to be telling you information that could help you, but you will never really know because you were only hearing, not actively listening.
4- Ask questions. We're all so busy talking today we forget to ask questions of the person in front of us. Asking questions shows interest in the other person. It builds relationships. It makes you different.
5- Do your homework. So, so easy to do today. But so many fail to do it. Just type it into Google. Check a Twitter feed. I never meet with anyone new without first checking out their LinkedIn profile.
6- Be authentic. I'm talking true authenticity. Not the staged kind. Corporate speak is so very 20th century.
7- Smile. It changes everything. We've gotten so used to staring at our computer screen that sometimes we forget how to emote when in front of another human. We forget what a lasting impression one smile can make.
note: This is Day #28 of the 30 Day Experiment. Here are the details on how it all started.
Labels:
Career,
career advice,
career tips,
digital,
first impressions,
impressions,
LinkedIn,
multi-tasking,
Technology
Monday, July 15, 2013
Three Ways Technology Helped Me To Say Goodbye To Corporate Life For Good - Day 14
I owe a lot to digital technology. In fact, I'm pretty convinced that if not for the advances of the last five years I would probably be sitting in a glass-walled office someplace rather than at my desk in my living room.
Looking back, these are what I see as the top three reasons technology has allowed me to follow an entrepreneurial path.
1. It kept me connected. One of the hardest things to adapt to when you leave a busy office is not having all those human beings around all day. At first it seems like nirvana, being able to work uninterrupted and not having to pretend to be interested in a conversation a colleague has dragged you into. But it can get lonely at times. Which is where social networks come in. They keep you connected. You need a break and a little interaction and all you need do is sign on to Facebook or Linkedin. And you don't even need to get up from your desk.
2. It helped me learn what I needed to in order to move forward. A lot of people discount social networks, especially Twitter. They think it's nothing but mindless jabber. Sometimes that's true. But more often than not it's also a great source of news and information. It can connect you to like minded people, influential bloggers and potential business prospects as can other nets like Google+ and LinkedIn. The trick is learning how to use them right - which ironically can often be found at the end of the right link in a good Tweet.
3. It allowed me to inexpensively set up shop in the living room. Let's face it, even ten years ago it was not as easy or seamless to create a business with nothing more than an iMac and the geniuses at the Apple store to show you how to unravel its mysteries. Five years ago it was. Today even more so.
Lucky me. Lucky you. Lucky us. Thank you technology!
note: This is Day #14 of a 30 Day Experiment. Here are the details on how it all started.
Looking back, these are what I see as the top three reasons technology has allowed me to follow an entrepreneurial path.
1. It kept me connected. One of the hardest things to adapt to when you leave a busy office is not having all those human beings around all day. At first it seems like nirvana, being able to work uninterrupted and not having to pretend to be interested in a conversation a colleague has dragged you into. But it can get lonely at times. Which is where social networks come in. They keep you connected. You need a break and a little interaction and all you need do is sign on to Facebook or Linkedin. And you don't even need to get up from your desk.
2. It helped me learn what I needed to in order to move forward. A lot of people discount social networks, especially Twitter. They think it's nothing but mindless jabber. Sometimes that's true. But more often than not it's also a great source of news and information. It can connect you to like minded people, influential bloggers and potential business prospects as can other nets like Google+ and LinkedIn. The trick is learning how to use them right - which ironically can often be found at the end of the right link in a good Tweet.
3. It allowed me to inexpensively set up shop in the living room. Let's face it, even ten years ago it was not as easy or seamless to create a business with nothing more than an iMac and the geniuses at the Apple store to show you how to unravel its mysteries. Five years ago it was. Today even more so.
Lucky me. Lucky you. Lucky us. Thank you technology!
note: This is Day #14 of a 30 Day Experiment. Here are the details on how it all started.
Labels:
Corporate life,
digital,
FaceBook,
Google +,
LinkedIn,
Technology,
Twitter
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
The Most Underused App On Your SmartPhone - Day 8
My smartphone sits next to me as I write. I have over six pages of Apps. I can use it to check Facebook, the Stock Market and the weather in Paris. I can snap a picture, edit it with my Camera+ App and then post in on Instagram. I can read The New York Times and listen to Pandora. I can send a text, write an email and set my alarm for the next morning.
But the thing that used to be it’s primary purpose - before it became so smart - is the most underused App of all.
The phone call has evolved from being "the next best thing to being there" to an intrusion and an infringement of one's precious time.
Why talk when one can text?
Why talk when one can text?
And email? It's so much more efficient to do business.
Or is it?
Is it a better use of time to watch the phone ring and let voice mail pick up - than to experience human interaction?
Maybe.
Is it faster and quicker to reply to the phone message with a text rather than doing something rare and what in many circles is still considered polite and call me back?
Could be.
But not always.
And here’s the reason.
The sound of another’s voice is a source of human connection.
Did you hear that?
It’s why radio still endures as a medium in an age of multiple choice. It’s why podcasts are increasing in popularity.
The sound of another’s voice is a source of human connection.
Did you hear that?
It’s why radio still endures as a medium in an age of multiple choice. It’s why podcasts are increasing in popularity.
Your voice is a persuasive tool that does not translate in a text message. An email exchange might change the course of a difficult situation - but nothing will measure against the sound of another's voice.
True, it takes more courage to pick up the phone in a world that lets us hide behind our technology. But because it’s used so infrequently these days it also sends this wonderful signal that says the receiver is important enough to actually spend some time and talk with.
What a refreshing thought!
True, it takes more courage to pick up the phone in a world that lets us hide behind our technology. But because it’s used so infrequently these days it also sends this wonderful signal that says the receiver is important enough to actually spend some time and talk with.
What a refreshing thought!
The point of technology is to enhance our relationships - personally or professionally - not substitute. There are plenty of situations where the text or email is the best and quickest route to communicate our message. But not always.
If you don't believe me, give it a whirl this week and experiment. Let me know what happens.
If you don't believe me, give it a whirl this week and experiment. Let me know what happens.
Labels:
Apps,
Camera+,
email,
FaceBook,
human connection,
IDC Research,
New York Times,
Pandora,
podcasts,
Radio,
smartphone,
Technology,
Texting,
voice
Friday, June 21, 2013
French Women's Secrets To Using Technology
I first met Jamie Cat Callan back in my corporate days. I had signed up for a Saturday writing workshop she was teaching at NYU. She incorporated a lot of great exercises into what would later become The Writer's Toolbox. Miraculously, that day she got me writing. Just as much of a miracle, Jamie told me that yes - I was a writer. You see, at that time in my life I wasn't convinced.
I hold a special place in my heart for those I've met along the way who encouraged me to pursue to my art. So I try to stay connected. Which these days thanks to the miracle of social media makes it much easier.
When I heard about Jamie's latest book, Ooh La La! French Women's Secrets To Feeling Beautiful Everyday I had to get me a copy. And as you know when I come across something worth sharing - I like to do just that!
This delightful and insightful read is part self-help, part self-discovery and part travelogue of Jamie's adventures throughout France. At the end I wanted to go buy a new perfume and book a trip to Paris! But I also wanted to know more. I wanted to know how French women were adapting to the digital age. So I asked Jamie if I could interview her for my blog. She graciously accepted. Here's are her answers to the questions I posed.
And this alignment--that’s really the secret to ooh la la.
Thanks Jamie!
To find out more about Jamie Cat Callan visit: www.jamiecatcallan.com
To buy Ooh La La! French Women's Secrets To Feeling Beautiful Everyday (which I recommend you do!) click here!
I hold a special place in my heart for those I've met along the way who encouraged me to pursue to my art. So I try to stay connected. Which these days thanks to the miracle of social media makes it much easier.
When I heard about Jamie's latest book, Ooh La La! French Women's Secrets To Feeling Beautiful Everyday I had to get me a copy. And as you know when I come across something worth sharing - I like to do just that!
This delightful and insightful read is part self-help, part self-discovery and part travelogue of Jamie's adventures throughout France. At the end I wanted to go buy a new perfume and book a trip to Paris! But I also wanted to know more. I wanted to know how French women were adapting to the digital age. So I asked Jamie if I could interview her for my blog. She graciously accepted. Here's are her answers to the questions I posed.
What do French women think of all this new technology? Are they fans of 24/7 connection? Do they have Facebook pages?
This is such a great question, because the answer is really a yes and a no. And that’s so French—to live in a kind of grey area. Still, I would say that French women are definitely not into the 24/7 technology and while many French girls love their smartphones, they don’t participate in as much social media as we do. It’s not unusual for a French Woman to pull herself off Facebook and suddenly become very mysterious. This is especially true if she’s fallen in love!
Do you find French women as attached to their smartphones and tablets as we are? How does a French women incorporate her smartphone into her sense of style?
In recent years, the smartphone and the tablet have replaced the intriguing paperback book a French woman might carry with her on her walks. A French woman will position herself in the park or at an outdoor cafĂ© and then she’ll check her smartphone (one with a artsy case that reflects her personality). That said, she would also be sure to look up from time to time to catch the flirtatious glance from the man at the nearby table. It’s a matter of balance—so she will not get so hooked into her gadget that she forgets there’s a big wide world out there.
You write about how French women feel permission to be completely themselves. Do they extend that to their on-line interactions or are they more guarded?
While French women do give themselves permission to be completely themselves, they may not be so willing to share all the details of their lives. I have many French women friends who are simple not on-line in terms of blogging, Facebook, Twitter and Pinterest, etc. But, the French women that I do know who participate in social media have something amazing to show or tell. They create beautiful style blogs, or post the most amazing travel photos on Facebook. For French women, it’s about having something interesting to share and the presentation is important. This is part of the French philosophy. Micheline Tanguy, a charisma expert I talk about in Ooh La La! told me, “the French like to put a flower on everything.” And I think this is true, even when it comes to on-line interactions.
You talk about fashion being a conversation and how it often starts with a photo snapped by The Sartorialist. I’ve been a big fan of his from when he wasn’t so famous. How does a French woman react when it is her whose photo is being taken and then posted on a blog for the entire world to see?
I’ve actually taken photos of stylish French women, Sartorialist style. It seems to me that younger French women, especially women who are in the beauty and style business, don’t mind having their photo taken and then shared. (You just have to ask permission). I find that older French women are much more reticent, so I try to respect that. I also travel with a postcard of my book, with a barcode scan for my Facebook page, so that the woman I’d like to photograph can see that I’m serious and artful about what I do. The truth is, I think Bill Cummingham and The Sartorialist have paved the wave for street style photographers all over the world, and stylish women are much more open to being featured on-line.
Without giving away your adventure at the end of the book – how did it feel to be without internet connection for so many days? Do you recommend the respite?
I did have quite an adventure—and while still remaining mysterious, I’ll say this—I spent nine days in a hospital in Toulouse without internet or phone (although I could receive the occasional incoming phone call). It was hard to be so out-of-touch at first and it almost felt as if I was coming off an addiction. I did find that I could stay grounded by writing notes in my little notebook, keeping track of the time with my wristwatch (yes, very old school!), taking lots of photographs of the doctors and nurses and all my French hospital meals (which were delicious!) And finally, I found that staring out the window to see what the sky was doing and how the changing colors brought with them the passage of time was very soothing, indeed.
Lastly, you write that French women transfer handicaps to assets. I just love that philosophy! Do they see technology as a handicap or an asset in their allure and mystique?
I’ve met French women who completely embrace technology and use it artfully to share their particular passion—whether it’s making their own macarons, or designing landscapes or following fashion trends. I’ve also met French women who seem completely off the grid, living in ancient farmhouses that they’ve restored themselves using river rocks for walls and reconstructing wooden beams from the 11th century. And so, in terms of allure—I believe French women know themselves. They embrace their uniqueness with great passion and confidence, whether this involves using a smartphone or not.
If a French woman does embrace technology, she will “add a flower to it” and yes, this love of technology will not be a handicap for her, but an asset and it will add to her mystique, because she is in alignment with her truest self.
And this alignment--that’s really the secret to ooh la la.Thanks Jamie!
To find out more about Jamie Cat Callan visit: www.jamiecatcallan.com
To buy Ooh La La! French Women's Secrets To Feeling Beautiful Everyday (which I recommend you do!) click here!
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
The 140 Character Universe
Sometimes there are just too many words.
Yes, that was me who wrote that. A writer at her core. A person who needs words. Lots of them to express herself in the way in which she wants.
But sometimes less is more.Scratch that. When it comes to words, less is always more.
Writers are taught to clean it up and to show me, don't tell me. It's ingrained in the head of a writer. The little bird sitting on your shoulder - asking - is that word REALLY necessary?
Of course, today everyone is writing. If not the great American novel, chances are somewhere in the course of an average day a line or two is posted on Facebook, a Tweet is sent to your tribe, a shout out on Google+ or perhaps a cute little hook on Instagram. At the minimum you've sent at least one email or text message.
If someone has not told you about the less is more concept, you might not make your point.
-You might try a blog post that runs the length of one of those articles in Vanity Fair, which is great for a juicy magazine article, but considered a ramble for a blog that should run between 350-750 words.
-You might respond to someone else's blog post in 410 words with no beginning, middle or end that leaves the reader wondering what your point was and longing for the excess time that you seem to have.
-You might never get a retweet because the original tweet was just too long and there was nowhere to cut it down.
-That email you wrote to pitch a new client never got read because the reason for the note was buried somewhere in the fourth paragraph.
-The text you sent was so long it came in three sections which explains why your boyfriend still doesn't understand why you're mad. He never read it.
If your intention is being heard - or in this case read - get to your point. Keep it concise. Don't make us wonder what your point really is. In a world where our attention span has shriveled to that of a goldfish, there just isn't time to go wasting a lot of words.
Twitter forces the practice. For better or for worse. On the one hand it is a challenge to get to the point in just 140 characters (120 if you'd like your message retweeted). On the other hand, it forces us to get clear on what we want to say.
But even if you're not tweeting, the point of all this technology is to connect. The 140 character message won't always work, but it's a good barometer - especially if you want to make your point.
Yes, that was me who wrote that. A writer at her core. A person who needs words. Lots of them to express herself in the way in which she wants.
But sometimes less is more.
Writers are taught to clean it up and to show me, don't tell me. It's ingrained in the head of a writer. The little bird sitting on your shoulder - asking - is that word REALLY necessary?
Of course, today everyone is writing. If not the great American novel, chances are somewhere in the course of an average day a line or two is posted on Facebook, a Tweet is sent to your tribe, a shout out on Google+ or perhaps a cute little hook on Instagram. At the minimum you've sent at least one email or text message.
If someone has not told you about the less is more concept, you might not make your point.
-You might try a blog post that runs the length of one of those articles in Vanity Fair, which is great for a juicy magazine article, but considered a ramble for a blog that should run between 350-750 words.
-You might respond to someone else's blog post in 410 words with no beginning, middle or end that leaves the reader wondering what your point was and longing for the excess time that you seem to have.
-You might never get a retweet because the original tweet was just too long and there was nowhere to cut it down.
-That email you wrote to pitch a new client never got read because the reason for the note was buried somewhere in the fourth paragraph.
-The text you sent was so long it came in three sections which explains why your boyfriend still doesn't understand why you're mad. He never read it.
If your intention is being heard - or in this case read - get to your point. Keep it concise. Don't make us wonder what your point really is. In a world where our attention span has shriveled to that of a goldfish, there just isn't time to go wasting a lot of words.
Twitter forces the practice. For better or for worse. On the one hand it is a challenge to get to the point in just 140 characters (120 if you'd like your message retweeted). On the other hand, it forces us to get clear on what we want to say.
But even if you're not tweeting, the point of all this technology is to connect. The 140 character message won't always work, but it's a good barometer - especially if you want to make your point.
Labels:
140 characters,
business advice,
digital marketing,
FaceBook,
Google+,
Instagram,
Technology,
Twitter,
Words,
writing
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Drawing A Line
I am a big fan of technology. Not without its flaws I do believe it offers us more positive than not. For example yesterday sitting with my financial planner, the fact that he could pull up my portfolio in real time, something that we couldn't have done ten years ago is pretty cool. Or the miracle that I can talk via Skype to my friend Jane in Australia and it not cost either of us a penny. I can sit in my home office and write about whatever I choose and with the tap of the publish button allow whoever is so inclined the access to read it. These are all good things.
But then there is the down side. The noise factor. The overload of information. The things that inspired my Tech Detox Diet last year. When is it too much?
Exactly where do we draw the lines about that which we want to make public?
I got to thinking about this as I was reading a recent post on Penelope Trunk's blog. I have followed her since I started blogging, not because I am necessarily a fan of her perspective on the workplace but because she has without a doubt carved a niche for herself. She has a very successful blog and a growing business as a result. I follow her to learn.
She does quite often, go off the topic of the workplace and focus on her personal life, her kids, her divorce, her new marriage. The post I read the other day disturbed me for a lot of reasons. But my point here is not about the specifics of those circumstances. It is the question it raised for me.
In our 24/7 easy global access world where is the line between sharing an authentic voice and true transparency and information that is better kept private?
As a writer and a blogger, I am well aware that the more honest and transparent my writing the more it resonates with my readers. I can tell in the comments I get and the emails I receive. But I do have a line. That I will not cross. Just don't ask me to describe it, because it is more a gut feeling, common sense type of thing that I just know.
My question here is not just relegated to bloggers. Take a look at some of status updates people post on Facebook. If the FCC was monitoring they would be fined. Or your Twitter feed. It can be horrifying to see what parts of their lives people choose to make public for everyone and anyone to see anywhere. And the thing is once posted this stuff never really goes away. It resides somewhere on some giant server, someplace.
Then there is the issue of cell phone use in public venues. I listened in on a conversation while waiting in line at Starbucks yesterday. I was not eavesdropping. The only way I could avoid listening would be to cover my ears. The woman was angry and animated. Apparently because the friend she was talking to and another woman had made what she considered disparaging comments concerning her therapy and her children. This she announced so all of us on line could hear was "private" and not "up for discussion". This woman had drawn her line but what I found interesting is how crooked it appeared. While waiting for my morning fix I learned she had one kid, was in therapy, the friend in question was named Jennifer and she was not particularly fond of how Jennifer and her husband were raising their own two children. She was interested in her privacy but not concerned with the dozen or so people waiting for lattes who had been given no choice but to hear these details of her life.
I'm glad I have my line even if I can't describe it to you. I will always strive to write in an authentic and transparent voice but there will always be parts of my life that will stay private. I'll continue to subscribe to Seth Godin's advice that we should live our life on line as though we are on Candid Camera.
Do you have a line you draw?
Where is it?
How public are you willing to make your private life in a world of social networks?
But then there is the down side. The noise factor. The overload of information. The things that inspired my Tech Detox Diet last year. When is it too much?
Exactly where do we draw the lines about that which we want to make public?
I got to thinking about this as I was reading a recent post on Penelope Trunk's blog. I have followed her since I started blogging, not because I am necessarily a fan of her perspective on the workplace but because she has without a doubt carved a niche for herself. She has a very successful blog and a growing business as a result. I follow her to learn.
She does quite often, go off the topic of the workplace and focus on her personal life, her kids, her divorce, her new marriage. The post I read the other day disturbed me for a lot of reasons. But my point here is not about the specifics of those circumstances. It is the question it raised for me.
In our 24/7 easy global access world where is the line between sharing an authentic voice and true transparency and information that is better kept private?
As a writer and a blogger, I am well aware that the more honest and transparent my writing the more it resonates with my readers. I can tell in the comments I get and the emails I receive. But I do have a line. That I will not cross. Just don't ask me to describe it, because it is more a gut feeling, common sense type of thing that I just know.
My question here is not just relegated to bloggers. Take a look at some of status updates people post on Facebook. If the FCC was monitoring they would be fined. Or your Twitter feed. It can be horrifying to see what parts of their lives people choose to make public for everyone and anyone to see anywhere. And the thing is once posted this stuff never really goes away. It resides somewhere on some giant server, someplace.
Then there is the issue of cell phone use in public venues. I listened in on a conversation while waiting in line at Starbucks yesterday. I was not eavesdropping. The only way I could avoid listening would be to cover my ears. The woman was angry and animated. Apparently because the friend she was talking to and another woman had made what she considered disparaging comments concerning her therapy and her children. This she announced so all of us on line could hear was "private" and not "up for discussion". This woman had drawn her line but what I found interesting is how crooked it appeared. While waiting for my morning fix I learned she had one kid, was in therapy, the friend in question was named Jennifer and she was not particularly fond of how Jennifer and her husband were raising their own two children. She was interested in her privacy but not concerned with the dozen or so people waiting for lattes who had been given no choice but to hear these details of her life.
I'm glad I have my line even if I can't describe it to you. I will always strive to write in an authentic and transparent voice but there will always be parts of my life that will stay private. I'll continue to subscribe to Seth Godin's advice that we should live our life on line as though we are on Candid Camera.
Do you have a line you draw?
Where is it?
How public are you willing to make your private life in a world of social networks?
Labels:
Privacy,
Technology
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Detox Tech Diet Day 6. What Would Dad Say ?
I've been wondering what my father would have to say about all this technology. When Dad left this world it was 1986. A lot had changed since he was born in 1921, but in retrospect the change was just the tip of the iceberg.
In 1986 a cellular phone in an automobile was a relatively new concept. Handheld phones were rare and big enough to double as a doorstop. And if you don't believe me check out the one Michael Douglas is using in the movie Wall Street. There was no Internet information highway, no iPods, cable television was considered a luxury and CNN was only six years old.
So today, on Father's Day, also Day 6 of my Detox Tech Diet, I am wondering what he would have to say about this plugged into something 24/7 world we live in.
Dad was a fan of new technology. He got into the appliance business in the early days of refrigeration. He worked for companies like Crosley, Westinghouse, and Philco-Ford. My mother tells me that when they were first married in 1951 they had no money and very little furniture, but they had a black and white Crosley television that sat on a cardboard box they turned on to watch a funny new show called I Love Lucy.
Dad worked surrounded by what was considered cutting edge at that time and so we grew up with an abundance of the latest new technology, like the dishwasher on wheels that barely fit next to the counter and had to be attached with a hose to the kitchen faucet.
Dad was fascinated by progress. And I imagine he would be sitting wide eyed and with a great big smile in front of the computer my mother refuses to own if he were still here. He would have enjoyed keeping up with every member of our big fat Greek family through pictures on Facebook. I think he would have embraced cable and I imagine be a fan of the History Channel. I don't believe he would ever forgo the newspaper, if for nothing else the crossword puzzle. Dad is one of the few people I have ever known that could complete the entire Sunday puzzle and in ink.
But Dad was also a socializer. He liked people. I think he too would worry about communicating more electronically than in person. He would miss the likes of Walter Cronkite style journalism while still being mesmerized by the speed and ease in which information is now shared.
Dad also believed in his quiet time. While not very Zen, his morning ritual consisted of coffee and a cigarette in silence. He would get up early so he could take some time to sit at the kitchen table quietly in his own thoughts. I never thought to ask what he was thinking about. I only knew to be sure not to interrupt his special time.
My detox tech diet Day 6 continues on Father's Day. And in honor of Dad I will conduct my own version of his morning ritual. It will not include a cigarette but there will be coffee and silence and lots of thinking. Mostly about him.
In 1986 a cellular phone in an automobile was a relatively new concept. Handheld phones were rare and big enough to double as a doorstop. And if you don't believe me check out the one Michael Douglas is using in the movie Wall Street. There was no Internet information highway, no iPods, cable television was considered a luxury and CNN was only six years old.
So today, on Father's Day, also Day 6 of my Detox Tech Diet, I am wondering what he would have to say about this plugged into something 24/7 world we live in.
Dad was a fan of new technology. He got into the appliance business in the early days of refrigeration. He worked for companies like Crosley, Westinghouse, and Philco-Ford. My mother tells me that when they were first married in 1951 they had no money and very little furniture, but they had a black and white Crosley television that sat on a cardboard box they turned on to watch a funny new show called I Love Lucy.
Dad worked surrounded by what was considered cutting edge at that time and so we grew up with an abundance of the latest new technology, like the dishwasher on wheels that barely fit next to the counter and had to be attached with a hose to the kitchen faucet.
Dad was fascinated by progress. And I imagine he would be sitting wide eyed and with a great big smile in front of the computer my mother refuses to own if he were still here. He would have enjoyed keeping up with every member of our big fat Greek family through pictures on Facebook. I think he would have embraced cable and I imagine be a fan of the History Channel. I don't believe he would ever forgo the newspaper, if for nothing else the crossword puzzle. Dad is one of the few people I have ever known that could complete the entire Sunday puzzle and in ink.
But Dad was also a socializer. He liked people. I think he too would worry about communicating more electronically than in person. He would miss the likes of Walter Cronkite style journalism while still being mesmerized by the speed and ease in which information is now shared.
Dad also believed in his quiet time. While not very Zen, his morning ritual consisted of coffee and a cigarette in silence. He would get up early so he could take some time to sit at the kitchen table quietly in his own thoughts. I never thought to ask what he was thinking about. I only knew to be sure not to interrupt his special time.
![]() |
| Mom and Dad opening wedding presents in 1951 |
Labels:
Diet,
Father's Day,
Technology
Friday, June 18, 2010
Day 4. The Detox Does Not Get Easier
I'd like to tell you this is getting easier. But it's not. Day 4 of my Detox Tech Diet and in some way it's becoming more challenging. There is that worrisome little voice in the back of my head that keeps telling me I am missing something life changing by not checking my email every five minutes and that there is something of monumental importance in one of the 500 blogs that sits unopened in my Google Reader, not to mention the 65 newsletters in my inbox. I am starting to wonder what all my Facebook friends and Twitter followers have been up to this week.
But the voice passes. When I do check my email I am assured that I haven't missed anything that couldn't wait a bit. And that check in is slowly shifting into something I can look forward to as opposed to an energetic drain. If anyone really, really wanted to find me they can call. The fact is I am rather enjoying this pause.
And that's the thing I'm noticing. All of this obsessing and overusing our technological advances is not only draining the power sources of Con Ed, it's been draining me. Trying to stay on top of my tech plug ins is an effort by me to control when in fact I am the one being controlled.
But that's starting to shift. Like an alcoholic without her poison, I feel lighter this week. I am up earlier and with a much clearer head, even if my hands are shaking a bit. I notice more and more how epidemic this addiction has become and I am determined to find a balance.
Surprisingly I do not miss television news at all. But that may have more to do with my own personal backlash from spending so many years in the TV business and being forced to watch the 24/7 news channel I worked for. The other twist is that next to The View, that channel, NY1 is the only one I have to stop myself from turning on.
I threw The View into this diet because I consider it more a news source than a talk show. I admit to cheating a little here. I did DVR the show so I will have a week's worth of episodes sitting in my cue when this diet is over. The only thing I know about the show this week is that Whoopi Goldberg (my personal fav) is on vacation. I'm wondering if she heard about my tech detox diet and decided to take the week off and do the same thing?
Have I mentioned that I hadn't realized how much I missed the feel of newsprint on my hands until I really started getting dirty with it again?
I was a little worried reading in the Thursday Style section in the NY Times that in a world that gives a cell phone to a twelve year old, there are schools and camps discouraging best friend pairings. It will also soon be easier to divorce in the state of New York. Mmm. We seem to be OK with making and keeping Facebook friends, but not so good with working on those in person relationships.
I discovered in the WSJ that a former colleague and Corporate America escapee, Melissa Perrucci is the brainchild behind IndieShop, a TV show and website that features independent designers and that the secret to finding happiness in New York according to Ralph Gardner, Jr. is the simple things like people watching. Except that with iPhone4 preorders hitting the 600,000 mark, it seems the thing people are watching most is a handheld screen.
So I'm over the hump on this detox and determined not to cheat. I know I can't do this forever, but I also know that I will come out of it on the other side with a fresh perspective and a plan for keeping this more in balance. And that after all, is what detox is all about.
But the voice passes. When I do check my email I am assured that I haven't missed anything that couldn't wait a bit. And that check in is slowly shifting into something I can look forward to as opposed to an energetic drain. If anyone really, really wanted to find me they can call. The fact is I am rather enjoying this pause.
And that's the thing I'm noticing. All of this obsessing and overusing our technological advances is not only draining the power sources of Con Ed, it's been draining me. Trying to stay on top of my tech plug ins is an effort by me to control when in fact I am the one being controlled.
But that's starting to shift. Like an alcoholic without her poison, I feel lighter this week. I am up earlier and with a much clearer head, even if my hands are shaking a bit. I notice more and more how epidemic this addiction has become and I am determined to find a balance.
Surprisingly I do not miss television news at all. But that may have more to do with my own personal backlash from spending so many years in the TV business and being forced to watch the 24/7 news channel I worked for. The other twist is that next to The View, that channel, NY1 is the only one I have to stop myself from turning on.
I threw The View into this diet because I consider it more a news source than a talk show. I admit to cheating a little here. I did DVR the show so I will have a week's worth of episodes sitting in my cue when this diet is over. The only thing I know about the show this week is that Whoopi Goldberg (my personal fav) is on vacation. I'm wondering if she heard about my tech detox diet and decided to take the week off and do the same thing?
Have I mentioned that I hadn't realized how much I missed the feel of newsprint on my hands until I really started getting dirty with it again?
I was a little worried reading in the Thursday Style section in the NY Times that in a world that gives a cell phone to a twelve year old, there are schools and camps discouraging best friend pairings. It will also soon be easier to divorce in the state of New York. Mmm. We seem to be OK with making and keeping Facebook friends, but not so good with working on those in person relationships.
I discovered in the WSJ that a former colleague and Corporate America escapee, Melissa Perrucci is the brainchild behind IndieShop, a TV show and website that features independent designers and that the secret to finding happiness in New York according to Ralph Gardner, Jr. is the simple things like people watching. Except that with iPhone4 preorders hitting the 600,000 mark, it seems the thing people are watching most is a handheld screen.
So I'm over the hump on this detox and determined not to cheat. I know I can't do this forever, but I also know that I will come out of it on the other side with a fresh perspective and a plan for keeping this more in balance. And that after all, is what detox is all about.
Labels:
Detox,
Diet,
Technology,
The View
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Detox Tech Diet Day 3: Life Is Supposed To Be Simple
Life is meant to be simple and easy. That was the thought for the day on my Louise Hay calendar yesterday. It's humans who complicate things and now we have high speed 24/7 wired connections to take that to new levels.
It wasn't supposed to be like this. The promise was that technology was going to help to make life simpler and easier. That was what our engineer at the radio station I worked at in Washington, DC said when he set up my first personal desk computer in my office in 1994. We didn't have an IT department then. We had an engineer, the same one who made sure the radio station stayed on the air, also in charge of getting us all wired.
And yes, while there is information access and interconnectivity I would not want to let go of today, my diet research is substantiating that things are out of control. Last night I caught a man waiting outside the men's room door in Marea, with his thumbs feverishly working that Blackberry. He claimed there was a line, but really, when is there ever a line for the men's room and not the ladies room? I think he was hiding from his dinner companions and didn't want them to know they were not captivating him enough to disengage from his flood of email. Later that evening I had a friend call me fifteen minutes after he sent me a text, wondering why I had not responded. I explained that in trying to not check email I had hidden my phone from myself.
Yes, it is time to gain some control over all of this intrusion.
I am rather proud of my discipline. The email continues to be the most challenging, so I've reframed the experience. I look forward to the 4x a day I check it like a kid on Christmas morning, certain of some of the presents under the tree but eagerly anticipating a few new surprises.
I've stopped eating breakfast in front of the computer. I hadn't realized I was browsing cyberspace and chewing in front of my 21.4 inch monitor until I couldn't browse. So for a really creative twist, I've gone back to eating at my dining room table where there's a window with a view that does not require a mouse. What a concept!
The newspapers continue to enthrall me with new information. Stuart Elliott's column in The New York Times writes of a company that wants to intrude more on my dwindling quiet time with television advertisements in the supermarket right next to the products. I've been worrying about what is going to happen to our thumbs with all this texting and smartphone emailing, but in San Francisco they are worried about the radiation rate and are creating new laws that will require cellphone makers to list it.
I've also learned that Dawn dish detergent is being used to help clean oiled slicked pelicans. One bottle of Dawn for each bucket of water and three buckets of water to wash a single pelican! A mattress can cost as much as $33,000, the Shinnecock Indian Nation on Long Island has finally been officially recognized ( I hadn't realized they weren't), a star Ballerina was mugged in my neighborhood (It was really hard not to turn on NY1 for more details on that one!) and a new show called Hot in Cleveland premiered on TV Land to a good review in the Times. I was surprised to read Alan S. Blinder's Opinion piece in the WSJ (recommended reading). I didn't think the Journal allowed anyone saying something positive about our government's economic rescue efforts.
So I am gaining control. Not quite halfway done this experiment I know for sure that disconnecting completely is impossible. We are all too far into being electronically wired to each other for that to happen. And as one who embraces technology and social networking I don't want to. But there has to be a balance. If this has become our new addiction, then like food addictions and sex addictions we cannot eliminate them completely from our lives, but we have to discipline ourselves.
It wasn't supposed to be like this. The promise was that technology was going to help to make life simpler and easier. That was what our engineer at the radio station I worked at in Washington, DC said when he set up my first personal desk computer in my office in 1994. We didn't have an IT department then. We had an engineer, the same one who made sure the radio station stayed on the air, also in charge of getting us all wired.
And yes, while there is information access and interconnectivity I would not want to let go of today, my diet research is substantiating that things are out of control. Last night I caught a man waiting outside the men's room door in Marea, with his thumbs feverishly working that Blackberry. He claimed there was a line, but really, when is there ever a line for the men's room and not the ladies room? I think he was hiding from his dinner companions and didn't want them to know they were not captivating him enough to disengage from his flood of email. Later that evening I had a friend call me fifteen minutes after he sent me a text, wondering why I had not responded. I explained that in trying to not check email I had hidden my phone from myself.
Yes, it is time to gain some control over all of this intrusion.
I am rather proud of my discipline. The email continues to be the most challenging, so I've reframed the experience. I look forward to the 4x a day I check it like a kid on Christmas morning, certain of some of the presents under the tree but eagerly anticipating a few new surprises.
I've stopped eating breakfast in front of the computer. I hadn't realized I was browsing cyberspace and chewing in front of my 21.4 inch monitor until I couldn't browse. So for a really creative twist, I've gone back to eating at my dining room table where there's a window with a view that does not require a mouse. What a concept!
The newspapers continue to enthrall me with new information. Stuart Elliott's column in The New York Times writes of a company that wants to intrude more on my dwindling quiet time with television advertisements in the supermarket right next to the products. I've been worrying about what is going to happen to our thumbs with all this texting and smartphone emailing, but in San Francisco they are worried about the radiation rate and are creating new laws that will require cellphone makers to list it.
I've also learned that Dawn dish detergent is being used to help clean oiled slicked pelicans. One bottle of Dawn for each bucket of water and three buckets of water to wash a single pelican! A mattress can cost as much as $33,000, the Shinnecock Indian Nation on Long Island has finally been officially recognized ( I hadn't realized they weren't), a star Ballerina was mugged in my neighborhood (It was really hard not to turn on NY1 for more details on that one!) and a new show called Hot in Cleveland premiered on TV Land to a good review in the Times. I was surprised to read Alan S. Blinder's Opinion piece in the WSJ (recommended reading). I didn't think the Journal allowed anyone saying something positive about our government's economic rescue efforts.
So I am gaining control. Not quite halfway done this experiment I know for sure that disconnecting completely is impossible. We are all too far into being electronically wired to each other for that to happen. And as one who embraces technology and social networking I don't want to. But there has to be a balance. If this has become our new addiction, then like food addictions and sex addictions we cannot eliminate them completely from our lives, but we have to discipline ourselves.
Labels:
Addiction,
Diet,
Technology
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Day 2. The Detox Tech Diet Continues
I am happy to report that as I am about to complete Day 2 of the Diet I am still alive and breathing, not to mention feeling much more space in my life. The separation anxiety prevails but how could it not ? Aside from my own personal tethers to our electronically connected world, I am noticing more and more that I am not alone in this addiction.
Take yesterday at Equinox. First there was the short woman with the sunglasses, her legs moving quickly on the elliptical machine, clearly trying to keep up with the pace of her thumbs on the pink covered iPhone she held with both hands. Then there was the woman working with her trainer, who took not a moment to breath, but a moment in which they could both check their email and rush off a note to someone, somewhere. Maybe it was about those poor fish fighting for their lives in the oil slicks in the Gulf. I didn't ask. I'm not one to strike up conversation in the gym. Usually because I have my headset on, listening to my iPod. But maybe that will change soon as I have declared headsets off limits during this diet. Yes, even my exercise will be without distraction.
Because what I am getting most from this detox, is that all of this multi tasking takes us away from being with us. Doing two or three things at a time is energy draining. We are not present for anything when we stop midstream to answer a cell phone or check an email as if it might be President Obama himself or George Clooney and if we don't respond immediately our chance for a meeting will be lost forever.
As my personal research indicates this technological overload is reaching epidemic proportions. The WSJ supports that. They ran an article yesterday on Why Relaxing is Hard Work because we are so wired to other places and things. This was my favorite quote from Edward Creagan, a medical oncologist who writes a blog for the Mayo Clinic on stress.
"We're driving ourselves wacko with no time to power down."
Dr. Creagan suggested limiting your access to an hour at a time and he didn't even consult with me! Great minds think alike.
My newspaper meanderings also learned from the New York Times that Rawanda , a dirt poor nation has a national health plan. Turns out mosquitoes are more attracted to men than women, and Starbucks is offering free Wi-Fi access so now you can go have a coffee in a public place, stay longer, but be so involved in your laptop that you might not notice if Lady Gaga sat down next to you. More encouragement from business to not be with you.
I was sorry to learn that the CEO of Sara Lee, 56 year old Brenda Barnes is on a leave of absence due to a stroke. I was even sorrier when the better part of a half page article in the WSJ discussed only how this would affect the company and the shareholders and nothing to the causes of her illness or her prognosis. But hey, that's Corporate America for you. I just hope the stress of her electronic tethers to her job did not contribute to her illness.
As a side note this happens to be my 200th post.
Take yesterday at Equinox. First there was the short woman with the sunglasses, her legs moving quickly on the elliptical machine, clearly trying to keep up with the pace of her thumbs on the pink covered iPhone she held with both hands. Then there was the woman working with her trainer, who took not a moment to breath, but a moment in which they could both check their email and rush off a note to someone, somewhere. Maybe it was about those poor fish fighting for their lives in the oil slicks in the Gulf. I didn't ask. I'm not one to strike up conversation in the gym. Usually because I have my headset on, listening to my iPod. But maybe that will change soon as I have declared headsets off limits during this diet. Yes, even my exercise will be without distraction.
Because what I am getting most from this detox, is that all of this multi tasking takes us away from being with us. Doing two or three things at a time is energy draining. We are not present for anything when we stop midstream to answer a cell phone or check an email as if it might be President Obama himself or George Clooney and if we don't respond immediately our chance for a meeting will be lost forever.
As my personal research indicates this technological overload is reaching epidemic proportions. The WSJ supports that. They ran an article yesterday on Why Relaxing is Hard Work because we are so wired to other places and things. This was my favorite quote from Edward Creagan, a medical oncologist who writes a blog for the Mayo Clinic on stress.
"We're driving ourselves wacko with no time to power down."
Dr. Creagan suggested limiting your access to an hour at a time and he didn't even consult with me! Great minds think alike.
My newspaper meanderings also learned from the New York Times that Rawanda , a dirt poor nation has a national health plan. Turns out mosquitoes are more attracted to men than women, and Starbucks is offering free Wi-Fi access so now you can go have a coffee in a public place, stay longer, but be so involved in your laptop that you might not notice if Lady Gaga sat down next to you. More encouragement from business to not be with you.
I was sorry to learn that the CEO of Sara Lee, 56 year old Brenda Barnes is on a leave of absence due to a stroke. I was even sorrier when the better part of a half page article in the WSJ discussed only how this would affect the company and the shareholders and nothing to the causes of her illness or her prognosis. But hey, that's Corporate America for you. I just hope the stress of her electronic tethers to her job did not contribute to her illness.
As a side note this happens to be my 200th post.
Labels:
Diet,
Edward Creagan,
Technology
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





